Comparison and evaluation of ambient air quality at different nearby locations of LCL plant, 2014

Shahid Raza, Jalil Ahmad, Ayesha Ameen

Abstract


The monitoring of ambient air quality is very important to evaluate the effect of running industry on environment. The Lahore compost Pvt. Ltd. has its own composting plant that utilizes tons of municipal solid waste to make organic bio fertilizer. The tons of organic waste are transported to landfill site. This study was designed to check the effect of composting plant on nearby village, nearby roads and LCL site. The evaluated parameters for ambient air quality were PM 10, CO, TSP and VOC. The results were compared and it was concluded from this study that composting plant do not effect nearby locations. The results were according to the WHO standards.


Keywords


VOC, LCL, Organic Waste, Environment

Full Text:

PDF

References


. NIOSH. 1985. Certified Equipment List as of October 1, 1984. DHHS (NIOSH) No. 85- 101. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH. Updated annually

. Cadena, E., Colón, J., Artola, A., Sánchez, A., & Font, X. Environmental impact of two aerobic composting technologies using life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2009; 14(5): 401-410.

. Napoli, C., Marcotrigiano, V., & Montagna, M. T. Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres. BMC Public Health, 2012; 12(1): 1.

. Environmental impact assessment (2011), Lahore compost Pvt.Ltd

. Morgan, G. B. (1977). Ambient air quality monitoring. In Methods and Standards for Environmental Measurement: Proceedings of the 8th Materials Research Symposium Held at the National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Maryland, September 20-24, 1976 (Vol. 464, p. 381). US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.

. Environment Canada (EC) 2009b. Method for the Operation of TEOM Samplers for PM2.5 Monitoring in the NAPS Network. Environment Canada, Ambient Air Quality Section. No. 8.05/1.3/M. December 29, 2009. December 29, 2009. Environment Canada (EC) 2009c.

. Modak, P. M., & Lohani, B. N. Optimization of ambient air quality monitoring networks. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 1985; 5(1): 1-19.

. Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lu, Z., Lowenthal, D. H., Frazier, C. A., Solomon, P. A. & Magliano, K. Descriptive analysis of PM 2.5 and PM 10 at regionally representative locations during SJVAQS/AUSPEX. Atmospheric Environment, 1996; 30(12): 2079-2112.

. Kao, J. J., & Huang, S. S. Forecasts using neural network versus Box-Jenkins methodology for ambient air quality monitoring data. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2000; 50(2): 219-226.

. Operating Procedures for BAM-1020 PM2.5 Monitors in the NAPS Network. Environment Canada, Ambient Air Quality Section. No. 8.04/1.3/M. December 29, 2009. December 29, 2009.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7439/ijasr.v3i5.4166

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.